> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:19:08 +0100
> From: Martin.Kersten@cwi.nl
> To: users-list@monetdb.org
> Subject: Re: Perf. benchmark for monetdb
>
> Pong....
>
> Your performance benchmark directives are too specific and too general to cast
> any light. I suggest to run experiments yourself, starting at 1 GB and gradually
> move up the staircase.
>
> MonetDB does not support out of the box distributed processing. You are on your
> own in that area.
>
> regards, Martin
> On 1/10/13 6:14 PM, nitin sharma wrote:
> > Ping again..
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > From: nitins64@hotmail.com
> > To: users-list@monetdb.org
> > Subject: Perf. benchmark for monetdb
> > Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 17:18:17 -0800
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I am evaluating monetdb and was wondering if there are performance bench mark numbers like the one published in C-store paper:
> > http://people.csail.mit.edu/tdanford/6830papers/stonebraker-cstore.pdf
> >
> > I am looking for perf. number for 100 millions rows in fact table (500 GB) joined with couple of dimension tables.
> >
> > Does moentdb supports horizontal partitioning of data and joins across machine (distributed joins) ?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Nitin
> >
> > _______________________________________________ users-list mailing list users-list@monetdb.org http://mail.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > users-list mailing list
> > users-list@monetdb.org
> > http://mail.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> users-list mailing list
> users-list@monetdb.org
> http://mail.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list